UMEM Research Studies

Study TitleStudy DatesSponsorStatusPrimary Investigator(s)Other Investigator(s)
ARREST PNEUMONIA ARrest RESpiraTory failure due to PNEUMONIA 12/07/2022 to - Funded by: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) National Institutes of Health (NIH) ; INDE Sponsor: Joseph Levitt, MD & Emir Festic, MD Recruiting Kami Windsor
Gentry Wilkerson
Description:

Background 

Pneumonia is the leading infectious cause of hospitalization and death in the United States, with associated medical costs exceeding $10 billion annually. When patients require intensive care unit (ICU) level care, mortality exceeds 30% and survivors often require prolonged hospital stays and suffer from long-term disability. The host response to pneumonia is characterized by release of inflammatory cytokines that activate vascular endothelium and recruit neutrophils to help contain local infection. However, dysregulated inflammation can perpetuate injury leading to loss of endothelial and epithelial integrity and flooding of alveoli with protein rich edema fluid, which can lead to loss of lung compliance, refractory hypoxemia, and ultimately acute respiratory failure (ARF) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Loss of barrier function can also contribute to dissemination of local infection leading to septic shock and multiorgan dysfunction, which can cause ARF independent of ARDS. Currently, other than antibiotics and supportive care, there are no established treatments directly targeting the underlying lung injury that occurs with severe pneumonia. However, corticosteroids have been shown to reduce inflammation and preserve alveolar barrier function, while beta-agonists increase alveolar fluid clearance and preserve vascular permeability.  

Primary Objective 

To establish the efficacy of early treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid combined with a beta-agonist vs. placebo for the prevention of ARF in hospitalized participants with pneumonia and hypoxemia. 

Secondary Objective 

To identify baseline clinical and biological characteristics impacting risk of ARF due to pneumonia and impacting variable response to treatment. 


Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT04193878
Keywords:
pneumonia,
A Single-Blind, Randomized Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of a Single Dose of TNX-1300 to Placebo with Usual Care (UC) for the Treatment of Signs and Symptoms of Acute Cocaine Intoxication in Emergency Department (ED) Subjects 12/01/2023 to - Tonix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Recruiting Gentry Wilkerson
Dan Gingold
Description:

Background:  

 

Cocaine abuse and dependence and their sequelae are significant problems globally and in the United States. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in 2021 the number of overdose deaths involving cocaine reached 24,900 individuals. Cocaine-related emergency department (ED) visits are associated with chest pain, arrhythmias, myocardial ischemia, systolic hypertension, exacerbation of asthma, agitation, and seizures. However, there is currently no product licensed to treat cocaine intoxication.  

 

Based on its non-clinical efficacy profile, TNX-1300 shows promise as a novel compound for treating the cause of cocaine intoxication rather than the symptoms only. Thus, this is a single-blind, randomized study to investigate the efficacy and safety of TNX-1300 as a medical intervention to treat acute cocaine intoxication in the ED setting.  

 

 

 

Study Objectives:  

 

Primary: To evaluate the efficacy of TNX-1300 in the treatment of cocaine intoxication via blood pressure (BP) 60 minutes after intravenous (IV) administration in the ED setting.  

 

Secondary: To further evaluate the efficacy of TNX-1300 in the treatment of cocaine intoxication via assessment of BP, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and the Stimulant Intoxication Scale (SIS) at selected time points after IV administration in the ED setting.  

 

 


Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT06045793
Keywords:
cocaine, Tonix
Performance study of MiniCollect® CAT Serum Sep and MiniCollect® Lithium Heparin Sep blood collection tubes 09/10/2024 to - Greiner Bio-One Recruiting Gentry Wilkerson
Kathleen Stephanos
Description:
In the clinical comparison study capillary and venous blood samples will be collected at different clinical study sites in the United States (US). The clinical study consists of two (2) different parts: 
 
Part I: Study familiarization: 
Familiarization experiments are intended to get the study personnel acquainted with the study-specific procedures regarding the clinical performance evaluation (Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute [CLSI] GP34-A and EP09). A limited number of subjects will be recruited from adult and pediatric populations according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Capillary and venous blood collection is done using both candidate and predicate devices in a randomized order (CLSI GP34-A) and from appropriate sites. 
For MiniCollect® Lithium Heparin Sep tubes, blood is mixed with the additive (Heparin) by inversions and centrifuged.
For MiniCollect® CAT Serum Sep tubes, blood is mixed with the additive (blood clot activator) by inversions, blood is clotted and centrifuged. 
After processing, samples will be analyzed only for hemolysis index (Hindex) with single measurements. 
 
Part II: Clinical performance evaluation: 
Subjects will be recruited from adult and pediatric populations according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Capillary and venous blood collection is done using candidate devices and predicate devices in a randomized order (CLSI GP34-A) and from appropriate puncture sites. 
Sample processing will be identical to Part I. 
In total 11 analytes, representing specific indication areas, will be analyzed (seven [7] analytes from capillary blood and four [4] analytes from venous blood). In total, at least two (2) different measurement platforms will be used and if possible, with two (2) different methodologies. 
At least 100 data points (analyte concentrations) per measurement platform and per analyte will be collected (CLSI EP09c).Sample quality is investigated via  measurement of the hemolysis index (H-index).
 
The 11 analytes that will be tested in this study are: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (AP), Total Bilirubin (TBIL), Albumin (ALB), Total Protein (TP), Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), Creatinine (Crea), Glucose (GLU), Calcium (Ca), Potassium (K), and High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein 
(hs-CRP). These will be measured, and their concentrations will be compared to estimate the bias for each.
 
Objective:
This study is a clinical performance evaluation and intended to demonstrate equivalent performance between the candidate and the predicate devices. By comparing analyte concentrations from capillary and venous blood samples between predicate devices and candidate devices, their bias will be estimated. The bias between candidate and predicate device is the key metric to establish clinical performance and equivalency. The bias between candidate and predicate shall be within 
the defined acceptance criteria to confirm equivalency.
 
Sample Size:
Part I: 
5-10 subjects per analyzer/site: 
40 samples per clinical study site from both adult or pediatric populations [Capillary blood samples: 5x Candidate device 1, 5x Candidate device 2, 5x Predicate device 1A, 5x Predicate device 2A Venous blood samples: 5x Candidate device 1, 5x Candidate device 2, 5x Predicate device 1B, 5x Predicate device 2B]
For Part II: 
Per 2 sites: approx. 708 subjects (75-80% adults and 20-25% pediatrics;) in total. 
Per site: approx. 354 subjects per site (or analyzer) 
 
Recruitment of subjects follows a distribution requirement for analyte concentrations within a certain concentration range. The analyte concentrations of the samples should cover as much of the measuring range as possible. A table listing the planned distribution of samples into concentration ranges is found below. 
If at the end of the study the required data distribution is not met either additional subjects will be recruited to cover the missing measuring intervals with native samples, or a small portion of samples (max. 10%) will be modified (CLSI EP09c).
 
Interim analyses will be performed upon acquisition of 50% of the datapoints (of at least 100 unique/analyte) to evaluate whether the data distribution covers the measuring interval as specified in the data distribution requirements for each analyte. 
If the data distribution requirements are not met, recruiting will be adjusted.
 
Statistics:
Bias estimation: 
Bias is estimated by Passing Bablock regression from ≥100 datapoints for each analyte per measuring platform. Bias incl. 95% Confidence Interval (CI) is then estimated at the medical decision levels for each analyte and measuring platform. Statistical analysis of collected data will be performed according to CLSI EP09c. 
Bias interpretation:
For each analyte and measuring platform bias and its 95% CI will be compared to the respective clinical acceptance level (CAL) (=maximum allowable bias).
 
 
Keywords:
MiniCollect, Tube study
A Phase 4 Study Using a Test-Negative Design to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a 20-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Against Vaccine-Type Radiologically-Confirmed Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults ≥ 65 Years of Age 02/01/2025 to - Pfizer Inc. Not yet recruiting Gentry Wilkerson
Andy Windsor
Description:

Background:  

Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) is an infection of the lung parenchyma that develops in people outside of a healthcare facility and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Adults ≥ 65 years of age have especially high morbidity and mortality related to CAP and are hospitalized more frequently with the disease compared to younger populations. In 2011, 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (13vPnC) was licensed for use for active immunization for the prevention of pneumonia and invasive diseases caused by 13 S. pneumoniae serotypes. 13vPnC is effective and has substantial public-health benefit; however, non-13vPnC serotypes cause a significant amount of adult pneumococcal disease. Therefore, 20-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (20vPnC) was developed to further expand protection against the global burden of vaccine-preventable pneumococcal disease beyond that of 13vPnC. Phase 1, 2, and 3 studies assessing the safety and immunogenicity of 20vPnC have demonstrated that the vaccine induces immune response to the 20 vaccine serotypes, has a safety profile consistent with 13vPnC, and is anticipated to expand protection against pneumococcal disease in adults. Thus, this is a Phase 4, multicenter, observational study using a test-negative design, to assess the effectiveness of 20vPnC among patients hospitalized with radiologically-confirmed community-acquired pneumonia.  

 

Primary Objective:  

To determine the effectiveness of 20vPnC against all (invasive + non-invasive) radiologically-confirmed community-acquired pneumonia (RAD+CAP) caused by the 7 additional serotypes contained in 20vPNC beyond licensed 13vPNC among adults ≥ 65 years of age 

 

Secondary Objective:  

To determine the effectiveness of 20vPnC against non-invasive RAD+CAP due to the 7 additional serotypes in 20vPnC beyond 13vPnC (i.e., restricted to participants where S. pneumoniae is not isolated from a normally sterile site).  

 

To determine the effectiveness of 20vPnC against all RAD+CAP due to any 20vPnC serotype.  

 

Key Inclusion Criteria:  

  • Male or Female participants ≥ 65 years of age 

  • Hospitalized participant with physician clinical suspicion of community-acquired pneumonia with the presence of at least 2 clinical signs or symptoms, including fever, hypothermia, chills, new/worsening cough, dyspnea, sputum production, tachypnea, malaise, etc.  

  • Radiographic finding consistent with pneumonia 

 

Key Exclusion Criteria:  

  • Participant develops signs and symptoms of pneumonia after being hospitalized for 48 hours 

  • Received any pneumococcal vaccine ≤ 30 days prior to enrollment 

  • Unable to provide urine specimen  

 

Study Treatments:  

The planned enrollment is 12,500 adult participants admitted at approximately 15 clinical sites. All participants will have a non-invasive, protocol-specified urine specimen collected for pneumococcal detection and vaccine serotype determination. All other clinical and medical data collected will be done through direct participant interview and review of medical records. Participants are expected to participate for up to 2 days if the interview and urine collection cannot occur on Day 1. Additional data collection including vital status at Day 30 will be performed.  

 

Primary Endpoint:  

  • Vaccine Effectiveness (VE) calculated as 1 minus the odds ratio for 20vPnC vaccination among cases vs. controls multiplied by 100 adjusted for potentially confounding variables 

 


Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05452941
Keywords:
Vaccine data collection
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Conestat Alfa as a Treatment for Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme-Inhibitor-Induced Angioedema 05/01/2025 to - Pharming Healthcare, Inc. Not yet recruiting Gentry Wilkerson
Description:

Background:  

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is), prescribed most often to treat hypertension, have been used extensively since the 1980s. Additional indications for their use include heart failure, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and post-myocardial infarction. It is estimated that up to 40 million patients take ACE-Is worldwide.  

One of the major complications of this class of medications is ACE-I-induced angioedema (ACE-I-induced AE), which can occur in up to 1% of patients, with a relatively constant risk over time through continued use. AE may progress within minutes to hours from its onset, with the overall time course ranging from several hours to days. It is characterized by a localized, nonpitting, nonpruritic, asymmetric swelling of subepithelial and submucosal tissues, typically involving structures of the head, neck, lips, mouth, tongue, pharynx, larynx, and at times may involve the extremities and abdominal viscera. 

In terms of pathophysiology, increased circulating bradykinin levels are thought to be involved in the development of ACE-I-induced AE. Bradykinin is a potent vasodilator that increases vascular permeability through the activation of vascular B2 receptors, which leads to the rapid accumulation of fluid in interstitial tissues. ACE-Is directly block the activity of the ACE enzyme, which is also known as kininase I, the main bradykinin-inactivating peptidase in humans, resulting in increased systemic levels of bradykinin. 

C1-INH is a serine protease inhibitor that is normally found in the blood. Its primary function is the regulation of the complement and contact system pathways by binding irreversibly to target proteases. It additionally inhibits the fibrinolytic, clotting, and kinin pathways. Through inhibition at major points of the complement, contact, and fibrinolytic pathways, human C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) prevents the formation of bradykinin. The recombinant form acts at steps more upstream than kallikrein inhibitors like ecallantide, and bradykinin-2 receptor antagonists like icatibant. Thus, we hypothesize that Ruconest (conestat alfa), a recombinant human C1-INH, has a greater potential to inhibit multiple pathways, resulting in decreased downstream production of bradykinin, exhibiting a broader effect on ACE-I-induced AE. 

 

Study Objectives:  

Primary 

  • To assess the efficacy of conestat alfa compared to placebo in the treatment of ACE-1-induced AE based on the Time to Onset of Symptom Relief (TOSR) endpoint. 

Secondary: 

  • To compare the efficacy of conestat alfa to placebo for the treatment of ACE-1-induced AE based on the endpoint of Time to Meeting Discharge Criteria (TMDC) 

 

Study Design:  

This Phase III study is designed as a randomized, double-blind, two-armed, placebo-controlled study. It will be conducted at two centers in the United States. The primary aim is to compare the efficacy of conestat alfa with a placebo in the treatment of ACE-I-induced AE based on the TMDC endpoint, assess its safety and tolerability, as well as compare its efficacy compared to the placebo based on the TOSR endpoint. Moreover, the proportion of patients in each arm who are hospitalized, admitted to the ICU, or who require an airway intervention will be compared.   

A total of 24 patients, 18 years of age or older, who present with suspected ACE-I-induced AE will be eligible to be enrolled in this study. Patients must meet all the inclusion and exclusion criteria. They must also be experiencing an attack that is at least moderate in severity with one of the four primary efficacy airway symptoms (e.g., score of ≥ 2 for any of the following airway compromising symptoms: difficulty breathing, difficulty swallowing, voice changes, and tongue swelling. The duration of the attack must be less than 24 hours at the time of enrollment. All enrolled patients will be treated with the usual ED SOC in addition to study drug.  

Patients who meet all the eligibility criteria will be enrolled and randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive a single IV injection either 50IU/kg dose for weights <84 kg and up to a maximum dose of 4200 IU for weights ≥84kg of IV conestat alfa or placebo. IDS Pharmacy will prepare the study drug for administration. The study drug will be administered via IV bag after reconstitution over 5 minutes. A second dose of open label conestat alfa can be administered 2 hours after the first dose as a rescue medication if the subject has not experienced symptom relief (based upon TOSR evaluation). ACE-I treatment will be discontinued for all subjects and substituted, if necessary, with an alternative blood pressure medication at the discretion of the treating clinician. 

Usual care for the management of AE may be provided at any time by the clinical care team in the ED. The use of these and other medications, such as inhaled beta-agonists, will be recorded as concomitant medications and will be identified as therapies administered for the treatment of symptoms of ACE-I-induced AE.  

Patients will be required to stay in the ED or the hospital for a minimum of 8 hours for monitoring and safety assessments. Patients can be discharged after 8 hours if they have reached the TMDC endpoint  

and are deemed clinically stable by the clinician providing routine care. Otherwise, they will remain in the ED or hospital until the endpoint is reached. Airway symptom assessment will be performed every 2 hours after the 8-hour mark until the total time equals 24 hours. Airway symptom assessment will not be performed past 24 hours. 

Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT06679426

Keywords:
Conestat alfa, Ruconest, Angioedema