UMEM Educational Pearls - Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Title: Let food be thy medicine

Keywords: dietary supplements, complementary nutritional products (PubMed Search)

Posted: 12/24/2022 by Brian Corwell, MD (Updated: 7/16/2024)
Click here to contact Brian Corwell, MD

Over half of U.S. adults in the United States consume dietary supplements. 

Study design:  A quality improvement study using data from the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Tainted Products Marketed as Dietary Supplements

Dates:  2007 through 2016. 

Results:  Unapproved pharmaceutical ingredients were identified in 776 dietary supplements.

146 different dietary supplement companies were involved.

Most of these products were marketed for sexual enhancement (353 [45.5%]), weight loss (317 [40.9%]), or muscle building (92 [11.9%].

157 adulterated products (20.2%) contained more than 1 unapproved ingredient.

A 2015 NEJM study estimated that 23,000 ED visits per year are attributed to adverse effects associated with dietary supplements.

Estimated 2154 hospitalizations annually.

Frequently involve young adults between 20 and 34 years of age in addition to unsupervised children.

Excluding children, almost 66% of ED visits involve herbal or complementary nutritional products and 31.8% involved micronutrients.

Products for weight loss or increased energy were commonly implicated.

Finally, herbal and dietary supplements now account for 20% of cases of hepatotoxicity in the US.

The major implicated agents include anabolic steroids, green tea extract, and multi-ingredient nutritional supplements.

Anabolic steroids (marketed as bodybuilding supplements) typically induce a prolonged cholestatic, self-limiting liver injury.

Green tea extract and many other products, in contrast, tend to cause an acute hepatitis like injury.

 

Show References



Sugammadex works by chelating non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) such as rocuronium and vecuronium to reverse the effects of paralysis.  Dosing per package insert varies based on time from administration of the NMBA, and side effects, although rare, include severe bradycardia, hypotension, and asystole. While sugammadex is routinely used by our anesthesia colleagues, it is rarely utilized in the emergency department (ED) or intensive care unit (ICU) setting. 

A recent single-center study assessed 11 patients with either a traumatic brain injury (TBI) or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) who received sugammadex for neurologic assessment in the ED or ICU.  The median dose was 240mg and the median time since last NMBA administration was 101 minutes.

In 6/11 patients, the neurosurgical plan changed and it affirmed a poor prognosis in 3/11 patients. In the ICU patients, sugammadex was associated with reduction in unnecessary tests.

All patients had a GCS of 3T prior to administration and 67% responded to sugammadex with a median increase to 8T (P=0.0156).  MAP reductions were common with a median of -8 mmHg.

Bottom Line:  Sugammadex can assist in determining a neurosurgical or clinical prognosis plan in patients with TBI and ICH.  Larger studies are needed in this patient population and caution should be used inpatients who are already hypotensive or bradycardic.  A reasonable dose, especially when given >1h from intubation would be 200mg.  The team should be available at administration to note changes in GCS.

 

Show References



Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Title: Beware of piperacillin-tazobactam dose reductions in septic shock

Keywords: sepsis, piperacillin-tazobactam (PubMed Search)

Posted: 9/29/2022 by Ashley Martinelli (Emailed: 10/3/2022) (Updated: 7/16/2024)
Click here to contact Ashley Martinelli

Piperacillin-tazobactam is one of the most commonly used antipseudomonal antibiotics in the empiric management of patients with septic shock. The package insert recommends dose reductions for renal impairment in other infectious etiologies, but the impact of dose reduction has not been previously studied in patients with septic shock.

A recent retrospective, observational cohort study compared outcomes of patients with septic shock who received ≥ 27 grams (at least 3.375 gm q6 hours x 48 h-“NORM”) versus those who received < 27 grams (“LOW”) over the initial 48 h of septic shock (defined as concomitant norepinephrine infusion).  

Patients were excluded if they had death or hospice disposition within the 48h study period. The primary outcome was the number of norepinephrine free days (NFD) at day 28. Propensity matching was utilized to account for confounders.

Results: 351 in the LOW group, 928 in the NORM group with 608 pairs in the propensity matched assessment.

  • Patients in the LOW group were
    • Older (65 v 61, p < 0.001)
    • More likely to have lower renal function (20% with CrCl < 20, 35% with CrCl 20-40) which corresponds to package insert dose reduction recommendations
    • Received lower doses of piperacillin/tazobactam (20.3 g v 30.4 g, < 0.001)
  • Norepinephrine free days were statistically significantly higher in the NORM dosing group when looking at all patients and the propensity score matched patients.
  • In-hospital mortality/hospice disposition was also lower in the NORM group (25.9% v 35.5%, p=0.014

Bottom Line: Dose reductions of piperacillin-tazobactam appears to be harmful early in the management of patients with septic shock.

 

Show References



Question

Intraosseous (IO) administration uses bone marrow to deliver fluids and medications during cardiac resuscitation or other emergent situations where IV access cannot be established.

IV versus IO

  • No statistically significant difference between the pharmacokinetics!
  • Flow rates of IV cannula typically range from 20 to 200 mL/min versus IO ranging from 0.33 to >50 mL/min under pressure
    • Maximum rate of administration through IO is comparable to a 21G peripheral cannula.

Considerations When Using IO Access

  • Single line, ensure all drugs running through the IO are compatible with one another.
    • For example: plasmalyte is not compatible with most medications
  • If trying to quickly administer fluids utilize a pressure bag.
    • If medication administration (i.e. vasopressors) pump should be used
  • Contraindications to IO include:
    • Placement in fractured bone with vascular injury
    • Compartment syndrome
    • Cellulitis/burns at the site
    • Underlying bone disease
    • Soft tissue infection
    • Recent orthopedic surgery
  • Once a bone has been punctured by an IO attempt, it should not be used again for at least 48 hours. 
  • Intraosseous aspiration of blood is usable for lab tests, though accuracy has varied in studies. 

 

Show Answer

Show References



Prior studies have found that patients are at an increased risk for hypoglycemia when administered insulin for the acute management of hyperkalemia when they have renal dysfunction.  A new single-center, retrospective study investigated the risk of hypoglycemia and the overall effect of potassium lowering in patients with renal dysfunction and stratified outcomes based on the CKD level.

Patients were included if they were ordered insulin for hyperkalemia using a hospital driven order set and had CKD stages 3a, 3b, and 4.  They were excluded if they had dialysis within 6h of insulin administration, had DKA, or no repeat labs.  The hospital order set encourages 5 units of insulin instead of 10 when “renal failure” is present without clear guidance.

377 patients were included: 186 received 5 units and 191 received 10 units.  The average age was 65 years old, predominantly male, weighing 90 kg.  In the 5 unit group, significantly more patients had CKD stage 4 (60% v 30%) and in the 10 unit group, significantly more patients were CKD stage 3a (p<0.001).  The baseline serum potassium was 6 in each group.

The hypoglycemia incidence was not different between groups, with severe hypoglycemia occurring twice per group.  All patients received dextrose according to the protocol.

There was a significant difference in the reduction of serum potassium between the 5 and 10 unit groups: -0.63 mmol/L vs -0.9 mmol/L (p 0.001).

Bottom line:  Hypoglycemia occurred even with insulin dose reduction.  Potassium lowering was higher in patients who received the 10 unit dose.

 

Show References



A recent prospective cohort study investigated the effect of low-dose droperidol on QTc in an emergency department:

  • 68 patients
  • Droperidol dose: median 1.875 mg (range: 0.625-2.5 mg)
  • Given as a 2-minute bolus
  • 94.1% received for headache management
  • Mean change in QTc: +29.9 ms (SD 15)
  • 17.6% (n=12) experienced QTc interval >=500 ms
  • 4.4% (n=3) had a change >=+60 ms
  • No serious arrhythmias or deaths
  • 13.2% (n=9) had at least one non-serious event (restlessness and/or anxiety)


Low-dose droperidol has a small effect on QTc and most patients remained below 500 ms.

Show References



Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Title: To B or Not to B: B52 v 52 for Acute Agitation

Keywords: haloperidol, agitation, sedation (PubMed Search)

Posted: 4/2/2022 by Ashley Martinelli (Updated: 7/16/2024)
Click here to contact Ashley Martinelli

Diphenhydramine (B) has historically been utilized in combination with haloperidol 5mg (5) and lorazepam 2mg (2) in the treatment of acute agitation.  The most common rationale for adding diphenhydramine is prevention of EPS, however literature to support this is lacking.  A recently published paper examined diphenhydramine/haloperidol/lorazepam combination (B52) vs haloperidol/lorazepam combination therapy (52) to compare the need for additional agitation treatments as a surrogate for clinical efficacy.

 

This retrospective, multicentered noninferiority study included 400 emergency medicine patients, 200 per treatment arm. On average, the patients were 40 years old, 64% male, and predominantly Caucasian.  More patients in the B52 group had psychiatric illness listed as their primary cause for agitation compared to the 52 group. The two most frequently reported substances on urine drug screens, if collected, were amphetamines (35%) and cannabinoid (35.5%).

 

Results:

-No difference in the use of additional agitation medications within 2 hours

-More patients in the 52 group were noted to receive anticholinergic medications within 2 days, but indications varied and were not associated with EPS treatment

 

The B52 combination was associated with:

---Increased length of stay 17 h (10-26) vs 13.8 h (9-12), p = 0.03

---Increased use of restraints 43% vs 26.5%, p = 0.001

---Hypotension 16% vs 3.5%, p <0.001

---Use of nasal canula oxygen 3% vs 0%, p < 0.01

 

The addition of diphenhydramine may not be necessary to prevent EPS in patients receiving haloperidol for agitation and is associated with increased length of stay and adverse events, likely due to its additive sedative properties. 

Show References



Background:

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) as defined by CDC Health Advisory in May 2020 is:

1) An individual aged <21 years presenting with fever*, laboratory evidence of inflammation**, and evidence of clinically severe illness requiring hospitalization, with multisystem (>2) organ involvement (cardiac, renal, respiratory, hematologic, gastrointestinal, dermatologic or neurological); AND

2) No alternative plausible diagnoses; AND

3) Positive for current or recent SARS-CoV-2 infection by RT-PCR, serology, or antigen test; or exposure to a suspected or confirmed COVID-19 case within the 4 weeks prior to the onset of symptoms.

*Fever >38.0°C for ≥24 hours, or report of subjective fever lasting ≥24 hours

**Including, but not limited to, one or more of the following: an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), fibrinogen, procalcitonin, d-dimer, ferritin, lactic acid dehydrogenase (LDH), or interleukin 6 (IL-6), elevated neutrophils, reduced lymphocytes and low albumin

As of January 31st, 2022 the CDC reports the following statistics related to MIS-C in the United States:

·         Total MIS-C patients meeting case definition= 6,851

·         Total MIS-C deaths meeting case definition = 59

·         The median age of patients with MIS-C was 9 years. Half of children with MIS-C were between the ages of 5 and 13 years.

·         59% of the reported patients with race/ethnicity information available occurred in children who are Hispanic/Latino (1,746 patients) or Black, Non-Hispanic (2,050 patients).

·         98% of patients had a positive test result for SARS CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. The remaining 2% of patients had contact with someone with COVID-19.

·         60% of reported patients were male.

 

Management:

First-Line Treatment:

·         IVIG 2 g/kg dosed based on ideal body weight with a maximum of 100 grams (1000 mL)  

o   For patients with significant myocardial dysfunction and concern for fluid overload, the infusion can be given in divided doses over 2 days (1g/kg q12 x 2 doses)

PLUS

·         Methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg (max of 30 mg/dose) IV twice daily and switch to PO and taper when clinically appropriate

Upon Consultation with Pediatric Hematology/Cardiology will consider adding the following therapies to IVIG and steroids:

·         Enoxaparin treatment versus prophylactic dosing depending on D-dimer elevation and whether or not being admitted to PICU

·         Aspirin 3-5 mg/kg (max 81 mg/dose) daily unless platelet count < 80 K/mcl

Second-Line Treatment (refractory to IVIG defined by symptoms and fever persisting >36 hours)*:

·         Methylprednisolone pulse dosing- 30 mg/kg (max of 1000 mg/dose) x 3-5 days

OR

·         High dose anakinra

OR

·         Infliximab 5-10 mg/kg IV x1  

*All second-line treatment options require peds infectious diseases and PICU attending approval

UMMS COVID/MIS-C Pathway: https://intra.umms.org/-/media/intranets/umms/pdfs/dept/pharmacy-and-therapeutics/guidelines/umms-pediatric-covid-pathway.pdf?upd=20220125144550

Show References



Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Title: Calcium for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Keywords: Calcium, cardiac arrest (PubMed Search)

Posted: 12/4/2021 by Ashley Martinelli (Updated: 7/16/2024)
Click here to contact Ashley Martinelli

Calcium is commonly administered during cardiac arrest, but there is little data to support or refute its use.  The Calcium for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group study conducted in Denmark.  Their EMS system responds to all cardiac arrests with an ambulance and a physician-manned mobile emergency care unit.

Adult patients were included if they had out of-of-hospital (OOH) cardiac arrest and received at least 1 dose of epinephrine. Exclusion criteria were traumatic arrest, known or suspected pregnancy, prior enrollment in the trial, receipt of epinephrine from an EMS unit not in the trial, or a clinical indication for calcium during the arrest (i.e. hyperkalemia or hypocalcemia).

Patients received 735mg calcium chloride dihydrate (5 mmol CaCl –US standard product is 1000mg) or saline control immediately after the first dose of epinephrine.  A second dose was administered after the second dose of epinephrine if cardiac arrest ongoing. Teams were blinded to the treatments. The primary outcome was ROSC for at least 20 minutes.

397 patients were randomized (197 calcium, 200 saline). The average age was 68 years old, 70% were male, and over 80% of the cardiac arrests occurred at home, 60% witnessed arrests, and 82% received bystander CPR. Only 25% were in a shockable rhythm. The time to first epinephrine and study drug was approximately 17 minutes and over 70% received two doses.

ROSC rates were low and not statistically different between groups, 19% in the calcium group vs 27% in the saline group.  There was no difference in survival to 30d or neurologic function. In the patients who did achieve ROSC in the calcium arm, 74% had hypercalcemia.

Bottom Line: The routine use of calcium in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is not recommended.

 

Show References



Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Title: Kcentra for Anticoagulant Reversal

Keywords: Kcentra, AC Reversal, Anticoagulant (PubMed Search)

Posted: 11/6/2021 by Wesley Oliver
Click here to contact Wesley Oliver

Kcentra (four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate, 4f-PCC) is approved for the reversal of warfarin using a weight-based dosing strategy based on INR. However, since the approval of Kcentra, data has shown a fixed-dose strategy and use for direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is appropriate. There are even recommendations to use a fixed-dose for DOACs in some situations. Utilizing a fixed-dose strategy can help with decreasing drug preparation/delivery times and costs.

 

Our institution now only uses a weight-based Kcentra dose of 50 units/kg for patients on DOACs with ICH or trauma-induced coagulopathy. All other patients receive a fixed-dose of Kcentra 1,500 units or 2,000 units based on anticoagulant and other criteria.

 

Below is a diagram summarizing our current dosing strategy for Kcentra at our institution.

 

ICH=intracerebral hemorrhage

DOAC=direct-acting oral anticoagulant (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban)

 

Other points of interest at our institution:

  • Based on recommended monitoring parameters, patients may receive additional doses of Kcentra.
  • Idarucizumab (Praxbind) is the preferred agent for dabigatran reversal.

 

Show References



Take-Home Point:
Based on antibiotic resistance and PK/PD data, CDC recommends a single dose of intramuscular ceftriaxone 500 mg for uncomplicated gonococcal infections. Treatment for coinfection with Chlamydia trachomatis is now only recommended if coinfection cannot be excluded. Doxycycline 100 mg BID x 7 days is recommended as treatment for chlamydial coinfection, but adherence should be heavily considered and may preclude the use of doxycycline instead of previously recommended single dose of oral azithromycin 1 g.
 
Background:
• Neisseria gonorrhoeae is the second most commonly reported notifiable sexually transmitted
infection (STI) in the United States
• Treatment of gonococcal infections prevents complications and transmission, but resistance has
developed against several treatment options (i.e., penicillin, fluoroquinolones, cefixime, and
most recently, azithromycin) leading to changes in treatment recommendations over the years
 

Uncomplicated Gonococcal

Infections

2015 Recommendations [1]

2020 Recommendations [2]

Cervical, urethral, rectal, and

pharyngeal infection

Ceftriaxone 250 mg IM x 1 dose, plus azithromycin 1 g PO x 1 dose

Ceftriaxone 500 mg IM x 1 dose

>=150 kg

No recommendation

Ceftriaxone 1 g IM x 1 dose

If coinfection with chlamydia

cannot be excluded

Coverage provided by gonococcal treatment regimen

Add doxycycline 100 mg PO BID x 7 days

 
Clinical Data:
• Efficacy of ceftriaxone is best predicted by the fraction of time the unbound drug concentration
exceeds the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC)
• Monte Carlo simulations estimated fT>MIC of 20-24 hours is required for effective urogenital
gonococcal treatment – a 250 mg-dose did not achieve reliable levels for an extended duration,
while a 500 mg-dose did [3]
• In a gonorrhea mouse model, 5 mg/kg (which correlates to 500 mg for an 80-100 kg human) was
the lowest dose 100% effective at eradicating ceftriaxone-susceptible N. gonorrhoeae 48 hours
after treatment, with fT>MIC of 23.6 hours [4]
 
Conclusion:
• Higher intramuscular doses of ceftriaxone are required in order to optimize urogenital
gonococcal eradication
• Practical considerations pose challenges in implementing a protocol for delayed treatment of
chlamydial coinfection pending laboratory confirmation
• If treating for chlamydial coinfection:
o Heavily consider patient adherence to a 7-day course of doxycycline
o If adherence is a concern, treat with 1 gm oral azithromycin
o There are instances (i.e., rectal chlamydia) where doxycycline has demonstrated higher rates of treatment success compared to azithromycin and may be considered as first-line therapy [5,6]
 
Lauren Groft, PharmD; Infectious Disease Pharmacist

Show References



 Vancomycin infusion reactions can manifest as pruritus and an erythematous rash of the neck, face, and torso during or after a vancomycin infusion.  This is a histamine reaction caused by degranulation of mast cells and basophils, and can be caused short infusion times <60 min.  It is commonly treated with antihistamines and/or a slowing of the infusion rate. 

Historically, this has been called “Red Man Syndrome.”  As we move towards more inclusive language in medicine, it is increasingly necessary to remove language that is insensitive and/or offensive.  Not only is “Red Man Syndrome” offensive towards Native Americans, it also is an inaccurate term that implies a clinical presentation in white male patients when this reaction can occur in any race or gender. 
The preferred terminology is now “vancomycin infusion reaction” or “vancomycin flushing reaction” and is supported by physician, pharmacist, and pediatric professional publications.    
Allergy documentation matters.  Always include descriptors of the reaction to avoid labeling patients “vancomycin allergic” if it truly was an infusion reaction as this can lead to suboptimal second line therapy being unnecessarily selected.  
 
What you can do:
1.       Replace “Red Man Syndrome” with vancomycin infusion reaction in your teaching and vernacular
2.       Remove “Red Man Syndrome” from patient allergies and replace with Vancomycin Infusion Reaction with a short description of what the patient experienced
3.       Avoid using “Red Man Syndrome” in your future scholarly works and publications

Show References



Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Title: Outpatient Treatment of Pyelonephritis

Keywords: Pyelonephritis, Outpatient, Fluoroquinolones, TMP-SMX, Beta-lactams (PubMed Search)

Posted: 4/3/2021 by Wesley Oliver
Click here to contact Wesley Oliver

While fluoroquinolones have fallen out of favor for many indications due to the ever growing list of adverse effects, they still play an important role in the outpatient treatment of pyelonephritis. Fluoroquinolones and TMP-SMX are the preferred agents due to higher failure rates with beta-lactams.

 

Preferred Therapies:
Ciprofloxacin 500 mg PO BID*
Levofloxacin 750 mg PO daily*
TMP-SMX 1 DS tab PO BID**

 

*Consider a single dose of long-acting parenteral agent, such as ceftriaxone, if community prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance >10%.
**Consider a single dose of long-acting parenteral agent, such as ceftriaxone, if using TMP-SMX.

 

Alternative Therapies#:
Cefpodoxime 200 mg PO BID
Cefdinir 300 mg PO BID

 

#Beta-lactams are not preferred agents due to higher failure rates when compared to fluoroquinolones. Consider a single dose of long-acting parenteral agent, such as ceftriaxone, if using beta-lactams.

 

Duration of Therapy: 10-14 days

 

Take Home Point:
Utilize ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, or TMP-SMX over beta-lactams when discharging patients with oral antibiotics for pyelonephritis.

Show References



Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic medication that has been trialed in previous small studies to treat epistaxis. The data to this point has not reliably shown a reduction in bleeding at 30 minutes, but has demonstrated an increased rate of discharge at 2 hours and a reduction in re-bleeding events.

The NoPAC study was the largest study to date on TXA for epistaxis. It was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study of TXA in adult patients with persistent atraumatic epistaxis to determine if TXA use decreased the rate of anterior nasal packing. Patients were excluded if they had trauma, out of hospital nasal packing, allergy to TXA, nasopharyngeal malignancy, hemophilia, pregnancy, or if they were referred to ENT.

Eligible patients completed 10 minutes of first aid measures followed by 10 minutes of topical vasoconstrictor application prior to randomization to either placebo of 200mg TXA soaked dental rolls inserted in the nare.

496 patients were enrolled. The average patient was 70 years old with stable vitals 150/80mmHg, HR 80 bpm with >60% on oral anticoagulants.

TXA did not reduce the need for anterior nasal packing: 100 (41.3% placebo) vs 111 (43.7% TXA) OR 1.11 (0.77-1.59). There were no differences in the rates of adverse events.

Bottom Line: TXA does not improve rates of anterior nasal packing for patients with persistent epistaxis.

Show References



Buprenorphine is a partial opioid receptor agonist that has a higher binding affinity than pure opioid agonists. There can be unease in managing acute pain in patients sustained on buprenorphine for opioid use disorder due to many factors.

The main barriers to effective pain management in these patients are:

  1. Opioid-Induced Hyperalgesia
    1. Patients maintained on buprenorphine can have an increased sensitivity to pain.
    2. Consider using a multimodal approach that optimizes non-opioid analgesics, such as acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
  2. Opioid Tolerance
    1. Patients maintained on buprenorphine require higher doses of opioids to treat acute pain due to the decreased effectiveness of opioids over time.
    2. As in hyperalgesia, a multimodal approach can be beneficial.
    3. Higher doses of supplemental opioids will be required in these patients compared with opioid-naïve patients.
    4. Titrate supplemental opioids to effect and monitor for toxicity.
  3. Opioid Withdrawal
    1. Opioid withdrawal symptoms can contribute to stress and anxiety, increasing pain sensitivity.
    2. To prevent withdrawal symptoms it is appropriate to continue buprenorphine throughout the episode of acute pain.
    3. The patient's typical home dose of buprenorphine can be utilized.

 

Take Home Points
In general, the treatment strategy for acute pain in patients on buprenorphine should be:

  • Optimize non-opioid analgesia.
  • Use supplemental opioids when needed.
    • Will likely require higher doses.
    • Titrate to effect.
    • Monitor for toxicity.
  • Continue buprenorphine therapy at home dose throughout the acute pain episode.

Show References



Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Title: Octreotide Shortage: Vasopressin for Variceal Bleeding

Keywords: Octreotide, Vasopressin, Variceal Bleeding (PubMed Search)

Posted: 1/2/2021 by Wesley Oliver
Click here to contact Wesley Oliver

With a national shortage of octreotide an alternative treatment plan had to be implemented at our institution for patients presenting with variceal bleeding.

 

Drug references recommend a continuous infusion of vasopressin at 0.2 to 0.4 units/minute. Dose may be titrated as needed to a maximum dose of 0.8 units/minute with maximum duration of 24 hours to reduce incidence of adverse effects. Administer IV nitroglycerin concurrently to prevent ischemic complications and monitor closely for signs/symptoms of myocardial, peripheral, and bowel ischemia.

 

Protocol at our institution:

Vasopressin

  • Initiate vasopressin at 0.2 units/min.

  • Increase by 0.2 units/min if bleeding is not controlled after one hour (max dose: 0.8 units/min).

  • If bleeding controlled for 2 hours, can decrease by 0.2 units/min and reassess.

  • Limit use to 24 hours.

Nitroglycerin

  • Use nitroglycerin infusion to prevent adverse effects from vasopressin.

  • Initiate nitroglycerin at 40 mcg/min, titrate by 40 mcg/min to a max dose of 400 mcg/min.

  • Goal systolic blood press pressure of 90-100 mmHg.  Do not start nitroglycerin if SBP <90 mmHg.

***Please note the vasopressin dose for this indication is significantly higher than the typical dose of 0.03 units/min we use for shock.***

 

Show References



Opioid Conversion Updates

Updated in 2018, some clinicians are unaware of the changes to the opioid conversion tables.

 

2010 Recommendations

 

2018 Updates

Opioid

IV (mg)

PO (mg)

 

IV (mg)

PO (mg)

Morphine

10

30

 

10

25

Fentanyl

0.1

NA

 

0.15

NA

Hydromorphone

1.5

7.5

 

2

5

Oxycodone

NA

20

 

NA

20

 

When converting between opioids, it is important to remember the following steps:

  1. Determine the patient’s level of pain and current response to therapy.
  2. Calculate current opioid requirement.
  3. Convert the opioid using table above.
  4. ASSESS! Combine Steps 1-3 to determine what is most appropriate clinically.  If the patient is suffering from severe pain, using the calculated dose may be appropriate.  If the patient is requesting a switch but is otherwise pain controlled, consider a general dose reduction of 25-50% in the new opioid.
  5. Monitor the patient for efficacy and side effects.

 

While online calculators can be helpful, opioid conversions should be done thoughtfully with a full patient assessment to determine the correct conversion for the individual patient.

 

 

Show References



Allergy documentation in the medical record is not always clear, nor does it provide clarifying details to understand timing and severity of beta-lactam allergies.  Approximately 8-10% of the population report beta-lactam allergies and 90% of those are not IgE-mediated reactions that would preclude the use of this class.  
 
A recent retrospective, single-center study of 438 patients was performed to assess the impact of these allergies on mortality and time to effective antibiotics in sepsis or septic shock.
 
-26% of the patients reported a beta-lactam allergy
-No significant differences with respect to primary source of infection (bacteremia and UTI most common)
-No difference in incidence of prior resistant organisms
 
Results:
-Overall, there was no difference in the combined endpoint of in-hospital mortality or transfer to hospice, time to antibiotics, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, and total hospital cost
-There was a significant difference in the susceptibility of the cultured organism to the initial antibiotic therapy in patients without a beta-lactam allergy (78% vs 57% p=0.009)
 
Bottom line:
Clarify all beta-lactam allergies in the medical record when they are encountered as they may impact care during the hospitalization or in subsequent encounters.  Do not delete the allergy, instead note the reaction or false report in the event that it is reported by the patient again in the future.

 

Show References



Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Title: Nitroglycerin Drug-Drug Interactions

Keywords: nitroglycerin, hypotension, PDE5 inhibitors (PubMed Search)

Posted: 10/3/2020 by Ashley Martinelli
Click here to contact Ashley Martinelli

Nitroglycerin is a potent vasodilator used most commonly for the treatment of angina and ACS.  It can also be administered as a continuous infusion for acute management of a hypertensive emergency or sympathetic crashing acute pulmonary edema.  

 

Most are aware of asking men for history of medications for erectile dysfunction (PDE5 inhibitors: sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil) but many overlook the fact that men and women may be on these medications chronically for pulmonary hypertension. Men can also be on these medications for the treatment of BPH. Be broad in your history taking and do not limit the discussion to erectile dysfunction or a specific gender.

 

Drug interaction:

-PDE5 inhibitors prevent the breakdown of cGMP

-Nitrates are nitric oxide donors that increase the production of cGMP

-The combination can lead to excessive vasodilation

 

If accidentally co-administered:

There is no antidote for this medication error.  Support the patient with Trendelenburg positioning, fluid administration, and if needed, vasopressors such as norepinephrine until blood pressure stabilizes.

 

How long should you wait to administer nitrates after a patient takes a PDE5 Inhibitor?

Sildenafil and vardenafil: 24 h after last dose*

Tadalafil > 48 h after last dose*

*Even if acute ACS event

Show References



Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Title: Esmolol for Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) or Pulseless Ventricular Tachycardia (VT)

Keywords: esmolol, cardiac arrest, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation (PubMed Search)

Posted: 9/5/2020 by Ashley Martinelli (Updated: 7/16/2024)
Click here to contact Ashley Martinelli

Patients with cardiac arrest due to VF/VT have a higher likelihood of survival compared to those with unshockable rhythms.  Unfortunately some will still not survive even with following the AHA/ACLS algorithms leading to “refractory VF/VT.”  The survival rate of refractory VF/VT is 3-15%, with poor neurologic outcomes. 
 
Esmolol has been proposed as a treatment for the electrical storm of VF/VT to counteract the deleterious effect of beta receptor stimulation by epinephrine.
 
A recent meta-analysis of 3 trials of beta-blockade vs control patients for refractory VF/VT found:
 
Beta-blockade
N=22
Control
N= 44
OR/CI
Temporary ROSC, n (%)
19 (86.4)
14 (31.8)
OR 14.46, 95% CI 3.63-57.57
Sustained ROSC, n (%)
13 (59.1)
10 (22.7)
OR 5.76, 95% CI 1.79-18.52
Survival with neurological function, n (%)
6 (27.3)
4 (9.1)
OR 4.42; 95% CI 1.05-18.56
 
Takeaway: Esmolol needs to be studied further in prospective trials, but may be reasonable to attempt in refractory VF/VT.
 
Esmolol products:
§  Esmolol vial: 10 mg/mL (10mL)
o   Vial strength listed in mg, not mcg
o   Can cause complications with calculations, especially in high risk code scenario
§  Conversion of mg à mcg weight à based calculation 500mcg/kg
§  Do not ask anyone to do this calculation during a code!
§  Esmolol pre-made infusion: 2500 mg/250mL
o   Pump is set up to deliver weight based doses in mcg/kg
o   No mental math required!
 
How to do it at UMMC to limit mistakes in calculation:
1.       Obtain an esmolol pre-made infusion bag
2.       Program the pump for 50 mcg/kg/min continuous infusion (this is a required step in pump programming)
3.       Program the pump to give a 500 mcg/kg bolus x 1
4.       Permit the background infusion to run
5.       Can give an additional bolus of 500 mcg/kg x 1 and increase rate to 100 mcg/kg/min depending on clinical response

Show References